Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a weight of 239g / 8,43oz, while Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Catana FE?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- With a score like 8.41 out of 10 (239g / 8,43oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
