Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Delphin SHARX 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Delphin SHARX 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
