Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI edges out Delphin SHARX 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19.84 lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (91cm / 35.83 inch). Still, Delphin SHARX 3000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a weight of 239g / 8,43oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
