Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- With a score like 8.18 out of 10 (273g / 9,63oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
