Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X
