Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
