Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
