Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
