Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG

Seafishing

201x

66.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €477.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size201
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Conclusion

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Delphin SHARX 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin SHARX 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.09 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?

Delphin SHARX 4000X

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X

A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits