Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.96 out of 10

Ergonomics4.08 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight275g / 9.70oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €47.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Conclusion

Delphin SHARX 4000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (7 out of 10) and ergonomics (6.09 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin SHARX 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?

Delphin SHARX 4000X

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues