Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
