Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Delphin SHARX 4000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in weight (273g / 9,63oz) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin SHARX 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.18 out of 10 (273g / 9,63oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
- Decent value at €69.95, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
