Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79cm / 31.10 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
