Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
- Solid value at €72.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of feeder and match fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
