Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Exceptional value at €229.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious feeder and match anglers and pros
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
