Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €159.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa BG MQ?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- With a fast retrieve 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
- Solid value at €159.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of seafishing fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
