Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Solid value at €154.10, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
