Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano AERO XR?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
- Exceptional value at €121.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious feeder and match anglers and pros
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
