Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 2500 FCX and Delphin SHARX 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 2500 FCX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin SHARX 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano FX?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 2500 FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
- Solid value at €18.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
