Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano FX?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Solid value at €18.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
