Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Decent value at €63.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
