Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Delphin SHARX 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin SHARX 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Decent value at €60.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
