Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Solid value at €399.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
