Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 6000X and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin SHARX 6000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
