Delphin YUPIE vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin YUPIE
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg
Weight234g / 8.25oz
Line retireve per crank65 centimeter / 25.59 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/335

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin YUPIE, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin YUPIE may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin YUPIE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin YUPIE
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
