Delphin YUPIE vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin YUPIE
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg
Weight234g / 8.25oz
Line retireve per crank65 centimeter / 25.59 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/335

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin YUPIE, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin YUPIE may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin YUPIE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin YUPIE
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
