Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
