Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
