Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
