Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
