Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
