Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
