Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
