Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
