Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
