Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
