Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
