Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
