Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
