Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Stradic FM vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
