Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
