Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
