Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
