Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
