Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 6000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 6000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
