Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
