Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
