Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
