Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
