Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
