Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
