Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and maximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
