Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and maximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
