Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa BG 3500X
