Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
