Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
