Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
